BBC: BRITISH BRAINWASHING CORPORATION

  A STATE GRANTED MONOPOLY PUTS THE BBC: BRITISH BRADCASTING CORPORATION IN A VERY POWERFUL POSITION TO  SELL BREXIT, EVEN THOUGH THE RHETORIC WAS A LIE - BY SIMPLY NOT CHECKING THE FACTS - ALLOWED BORIS JOHNSON TO POWER - LATER TO RESIGN  IN SHAME - NICE ONE

You could be forgiven for thinking that 'BBC' stands for 'British Brainwashing Corporation.'

The BBC still have a State granted Monopoly. Why do you suppose that is, when Articles 9 and 10 of the Human Rights Act 1998 says the British public have a RIGHT to receive and impart information, but then the BBC is allowed to charge a TV license fee, so taking away that right, and making you pay for something that should be free.

Basically, the TV license fee is a tax on having radio-wave receiving equipment of any kind. But, there are so many different broadcasters now, who provide free programmes to their viewers, paid for by advertising. Why then do you have to pay for BBC programmes, that you may not want to watch?

Why do you suppose that is. What do the Royals get out of it, in exchange for their (ascent) grace and favour?

Television broadcasts of the BBC, are held by the media to be so biased in their election reporting, as to help dodgy candidates that big money leans toward, to paint a fraudulent canvas, so adding to the con that was and is still being perpetrated about important issues, such as Brexit. But they have Royal approval to steal your money as TV licenses - even if you do not watch BBC programmes. Hence, it must be that such a situation is in violation of Articles 9 and 10 of the Human Rights Act 1998. The right to receive and impart information, being a right, it must be a choice, as to whether to pay for a service that you do not want. Not a legal requirement.

The monopoly granted, is a form of media tax to fund political spin that you may not agree with, and is designed to get one party elected, by not revealing the truth. It is also designed to make the Royal family appear in a good light to the world at large, allegedly.

The allegation is that this is State sanctioned propaganda, like the Russian news agencies TASS and Chinese Xinhua.

RUSSIA - The propaganda of the Russian Federation promotes views, perceptions or agendas of the government. The media include state-run outlets and online technologies, and may involve using "Soviet-style 'active measures' as an element of modern Russian 'political warfare'". Notably, contemporary Russian propaganda promotes the cult of personality of Vladimir Putin and positive views of Soviet history. To this end TASS is registered as a Federal State Unitary Enterprise, owned by the Government of Russia. Headquartered in Moscow, TASS has 70 offices in Russia and in the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), as well as 68 bureaus around the world.

CHINA - Media operations and content are tightly controlled, and the CCP, primarily through its Central Propaganda Department, determines what appears in news reports. Controlling media content allows the CCP to disseminate propaganda supportive of government policies, censor controversial news stories, and have reports published criticizing political adversaries of the CCP. In 2005, Reporters Without Borders published a report about China's official news agency, the Xinhua News Agency, calling it "the world's biggest propaganda agency", and said that it was "at the heart of censorship and disinformation put in place" by the government.

JADED FIRM

And, let's face it, 'The Firm' need a high level of spin, to overcome their ingrained biases, from years of accepting slavery, and capitalizing on that misery, that is the class system. With added spice in the form of Prince Andrew's friendship with Geoffrey Epstein. Hence, Royalty equals Slavery. Because, a "Class System" is based upon privileged humans being superior to other human beings. Thus, a form of legalized discrimination. And for some reason, a large number of Britons like being treated as lower class - instead of equals - with equal rights. They like being dominated and abused, and reminded on that, by the successors of their former captors.

Hence, the propaganda in "Rule Britannia." Britons are indeed slaves, and slave traders. The public and Commonwealth have been brainwashed into thinking it is wonderful to be subservient. The system is kept in place by Royalists, those with lands and businesses who are profiting from the present system. Those thinking freely, and questioning such a system, as youthful members of society, looking for equality, rather than a lifetime of paying wealthy landlords, might be seen as Abolitionists. But, they are being enslaved by councils all across the land, charging Council Taxes that are far too high in relation to the non-services being provided. A kind of fraud.

The notion that the UK can relive her Empire days, based on slaves, is utterly ridiculous, though we are still importing cheap foreign labour, funneled into our NHS. And, we still have financial slavery with banks selling fake money, as the elite, who don't have to toil, or lift a finger to raise a sweat.

Unlike Bojo deceiving Queen Elizabeth, and getting away with it, along with PartyGate, the King must (not should) dismiss newbies who lie. The real problem being that the Heads of State, are (allegedly) more than likely in on it. For, they surely cannot be that dim-witted, as alleged. The Palace has their own highly paid legal advisers. Meaning that the Queen (allegedly) knew Boris Johnson was a liar, when accepting his word as to the legality of proroguing Parliament. More glossing over inconvenient facts, in the rush to business as usual.

Let's not upset the natives.

And, don't forget that the Church of England, was a manufactured religion by Henry the Eighth, the beheading butcher, overseer of the Tower of London. He made up his own religion to bed six wives. When the Catholic faith would not condone such shenanigans. If anyone disagreed with him, then lost their head at the rate of 4.5 beheadings a day. And our laws are perfected by the 'Lords Spiritual and Temporal.' Henry's made up religion, tailored to his sexual needs.

DAILY EXPRESS 14 SEPTEMBER 2023 - MOANING REMAINERS BLAME BREXIT ON LAURA KUENSSBERG IN 'CATASTROPHIC' BBC FAILURE

Former BBC political editor Laura Kuenssberg is being blamed for Brexit due to the bosses who took her on according to a former journalist of the organisation.

Former BBC journalist Patrick Howse launched the scathing attack on Kuenssberg and her bosses in a piece he wrote for Byline Times calling her tenure as political editor for the BBC a "catastrophe".

He said that Kuenssberg and her style of journalism contributed to making Brexit happen - but that her bosses should shoulder the responsibility.

He wrote: "On her watch, lies were not just permitted, they were amplified and given credibility by Britain's state broadcaster.

"At least partly as a result of this, the UK Government now routinely lies with impunity.

"The country's international standing has been irreparably harmed, and trust in the political system has been trashed.

"I don't hold Kuenssberg entirely responsible for this state of affairs - I think that BBC managers carry a large amount of the blame because they chose the wrong person, for the wrong job."

He said that when it comes to Brexit that Kuenssberg didn't challenge what she was being told by the "upper reaches" of Government.

"What they got was a journalist with access to the upper reaches of the Government, with a determination to get on air and tell everyone the whispers that she had heard from ministers, advisors and officials - before Sky or ITN," said Howse.

He continued: "What the BBC needed was someone who could take a step back, away from the scrum, and tell audiences when they were being lied to.

"That was something neither the BBC nor Kuenssberg has ever come to terms with."

He added: "It began with the Leave campaign making lying a central part of its strategy during the Brexit referendum.

"The BBC's response was to 'balance' these lies with information from the other side - rather than using their editorial judgement to call out when something was blatantly and dangerously false."

The original piece was written in early 2022 but has been re-shared on X, formerly known as Twitter - and people have been outspoken in their support of Howse's stance.

One said: "Woeful takedown of a serious failure in BBC."

Another said: "Brutal analysis. Sadly difficult to argue against it."


NIGEL FARAGE

Speaking to Express.co.uk, Nigel Farage said: "Sadly the useless Tories have made life too easy for the rejoiners."

His comments were in light of the CER report suggesting that Brexit had cost the UK £33billion in lost trade and investment.

The research was modelled on the performance of a "doppleganger" UK using data from other advanced economies similar to Britain prior to Brexit, including the US, Germany, Norway and Australia.

Based on their progression since 2016, it suggested that the UK's goods trade is 7 percent lower as a result of Brexit.

Regarding investment, the report stated it was 11 percent lower than it would have been if the UK had remained a part of the European Union.

THE DMO

The British debt situation is so bad that the United Kingdom have to have a Debt Management Office.

The UK Debt Management Office (DMO) was established on 1 April 1998 and responsibility for government wholesale sterling debt issuance was transferred from the Bank of England to the DMO. This re-organisation followed the transfer of operational responsibility for setting official UK interest rates from HM Treasury to the Bank of England in May 1997.

The DMO's remit is to carry out the Government's debt management policy of minimising financing costs over the long term, taking account of risk, and to minimise the cost of offsetting the Government's net cash flows over time, while operating in a risk appetite approved by Ministers in both cases.

 Please see our A-Z INDEX or return HOME