Frequently, local councils in the United Kingdom are accused of acting like the Gestapo officers of Nazi Germany, now equated more to Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, the modern Hitler's who retain control of their countries by killing election opponents stone dead. Or arresting all dissidents and locking them up, never to be seen again.

 

Wealden District Council has one of the worst human rights records in the south of England. Mainly due to the Wealden Action Group (WAG) listing all violations, so creating a permanent record, that this council's officers, under a complete lack of control from their members, are doing their level best to obliterate, to limit future claims.

 

Without WAG, there would be no record at all of these HR abuses.

 

We would urge that every different council location, should have an active group of watchdogs, who do much the same. This is because the government are just as corrupt, actually encouraging councils to behave like Nazis, or we'd already have official watchdogs to prosecute the offenders. Councils in the south of England are not providing the barest of levels of affordable housing on the one hand. On the other hand building more and more executive homes for the CIL payments and higher rateable values, to pay for their golden parachutes, taking the shirts off the backs of honest workers. Even though, financial slavery is illegal.

 

Additionally, with Putin and Jinping on the rampage, the almost complete lack of civil defence precautions, is more testimony to confirm the absolute deficiency of protections for the ordinary citizen, such as the lack of communal nuclear bunkers, and no help at all for those wishing to protect their families from being invaded or bombed, like Russia is at the moment doing to Ukraine. What is Grant Shapps and Michael Gove thinking!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hitler accused Jews of having "nothing of their own, except for political and sanitary diseases" and being parasites on the German nation, turning Germans into "beggars in their own country". He asserted there had to be an end to the misconception that "the good Lord had meant the Jewish nation to live off the body and productive work of other nations", or else the Jews would "succumb to a crisis of unimaginable severity". Hitler claimed that the Jews were trying to incite "millions among the masses of people into a conflict that is utterly senseless for them and serves only Jewish interests". Hitler then arrived at his main point:

"I have very often in my lifetime been a prophet and have been mostly derided. At the time of my struggle for power it was in the first instance the Jewish people who only greeted with laughter my prophecies that I would someday take over the leadership of the state and of the entire people of Germany and then, among other things, also bring the Jewish problem to its solution. I believe that this hollow laughter of Jewry in Germany has already stuck in its throat. I want today to be a prophet again: if international finance Jewry inside and outside Europe should succeed in plunging the nations once more into a world war, the result will be not the Bolshevization of the earth and thereby the victory of Jewry, but the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe."

Today, a speech like this would be illegal. Inciting racial prejudice and hatred. He would be arrested, tried and imprisoned. With all the build up, and wealth creation in rearming Germany, and with the help of the Gestapo, few would stand up to be counted, for fear of being eliminated, sometimes permanently.

 

 

ARE BRITISH POLITICIANS TRUSTWORTHY?

 

The evidence shows that you cannot trust British politicians. Many of whom came from the ranks of corrupt councils.

 

We think that a very large number of civilians in the UK do no believe what politicians in the United Kingdom are telling them. Despite the British Brainwashing Corporation transmitting a 'rose-coloured-spectacles' version of the truth. In a bid to make the public think they are safe.

 

The threat of a nuclear 'World War Three' has never been higher.

 

NATO is at present impotent, while US and EU politicians are more concerned with making a quick buck and appeasing the electorate, than defending their countries. For example, there is no Civil Defence Policy. The civilian population is thus disposable, as in the subject of taxes. Collateral damage! It is one, unthinkable way, of reducing human overcrowding on the planet, even if rather drastic. Though a boon for climate change, in that culling may relieve the greenhouse gas burden for planet earth, though only temporarily.

 

Nations intent on expansion, will wait for our backs to be turned, looking for weaknesses, of which you don't have to look too far: David Cameron, Theresa May, Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunack, playing into the hands of Narendra Modi, who is relishing cheap oil from Russia, instead of standing firm against oppression. 

 

Over the past 30 years and more, the two cheeks of the same arse, Conservative and Labour, have weakened the UK immeasurably, getting us into inescapable debt, while Russia and their Communist and Religious allies have been growing stronger day by day. They are morally and financially bankrupt.

 

Russia's 'Adolf Hitler,' and Vladimir Putin's Imperial expansion agenda, stems from his days with the KGB. There is no stopping him, or changing his thinking, short of a lobotomy. The same goes for Xi Jinping. The only way to counter their offensive is by constant vigilance on the balance of payments, from cheap imports that are funding their world domination agendas. As, China offers loans to sucker nations for port improvements, then in default, take over those assets. And free policing for islands, is another low cost way of taking over from those islanders, installing - to all intents and purposes - martial law, under the control of a country who is supporting communist ideals, such as a total lack of free elections, the right to protest, and freedom of the press.

 

Europe and the US should have known that purchasing fossil fuels from a madman with nuclear arms, would help his word domination agenda, working with China and India, though Xi Jinping and Narendra Modi, might fight shy of World War Three, they are, as a matter of fact, pursuing a nuclear agenda along with aggressive commercial objectives, and even domination in space. All from sales of cheap imports and funding from the World Bank, International Monetary Fund, etc.

 

The solution is to ban cheap imports from China. All imports. Oil being shipped from Russia in tankers, would be legitimate targets. That is one reason why Crimea was so important to Putin. Though, much is piped. Why are those pipe lines still intact, if they are funding death in Ukraine? Should they not be blocked until peace is restored, even sections destroyed, or stopped up with concrete, etc? Has nobody seen the Dambusters?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NATO has done nothing about the build up of international tensions. NATO only protects political assets, not the residents.

The geopolitical implications of Russia’s aggression in the invasion of Ukraine may undermine the international cooperation and trust needed to address climate change effectively. Despite the efforts of the United Nations and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, that was designed by the parties to prevent such aggressions, and a similar scenario from happening again. But here we are again, with Putin just waiting for the right moment to take advantage of the West's apparent weaknesses, having built up a suitable stash of cash and arms, to wage his expansionist plans, almost exactly as Adolf Hitler, leading up to World War Two.

 

 

 

 

 

SNAKE CHARMER - The invasion of Crimea was all part of a long-term plan by Vladimir Putin to slowly takes over as much of Europe as he could, before launching any attack on America, with his ally China, weakening their economy, and also building up their military strength in stealth fashion. As it appears with help from Iran and North Korea. So, once again, it is communism versus democracy, in a political game of cat and mouse. In this case, with the UK and European allies of NATO, not giving two figs about the lives of their citizens, not have any early warning system in place. A fact that has not escaped Russia.

 

 

 

We can thus imagine a World War Three scenario, unless the Imperialist dictator is stopped dead in his tracks, by way of a message to other "strategic" partners, the most brazen of which is China. The problem being how to do that and stop the Russian 'lunatic' from pushing his nukem button. Clearly, his age represents a hairline trigger, lest his career dream elude him completely as he succumbs to senility.

 

He cannot be sure his successors will not be so foolhardy in the modern internet age, as the Russian population become enlightened. And voting might actually count one day. Especially concerning international issues such as warming of the planet, biological diversity and plastic pollution; poisoning our fish stocks.

 

The problem being that Vladimir Putin is a relic of the Cold War. It appears that he cannot get his head out of that particular cloud. Taking lessons directly from Adolf Hitler's pocket book on world domination. On that score, Vladimir Putin is not even original, as you might agree on reflection of the Führer's approach.

 

 

 

ADOLF HITLER AS A HISTORIC CASE PRECEDENT

 

Founder and leader of the Nazi Party, Reich Chancellor and guiding spirit of the Third Reich (Third New World Order) from 1933 to 1945, Head of State and Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces, Adolf Hitler was born in Braunau am Inn, Austria, on 20 April 1889. The son of a fifty-two-year-old Austrian customs official, Alois Schickelgruber Hitler, and his third wife, a young peasant girl, Klara Poelzl, both from the backwoods of lower Austria.

 

The young Hitler was a resentful, discontented child. Moody, lazy, of unstable temperament, he was deeply hostile towards his strict, authoritarian father and strongly attached to his indulgent, hard-working mother, whose death from cancer in December 1908 was a shattering blow to the adolescent Hitler.

Hitler's saber-rattling tactics bludgeoned the British and French into the humiliating Munich agreement of 1938 and the eventual dismantlement of the Czechoslovakian State in March 1939. The concentration camps, the Nuremberg racial laws against the Jews, the persecution of the churches and political dissidents were forgotten by many Germans in the euphoria of Hitler's territorial expansion and bloodless victories. The next designated target for Hitler's ambitions was Poland (her independence guaranteed by Britain and France) and, to avoid a two-front war, the Nazi dictator signed a pact of friendship and non-aggression with Soviet Russia. On 1 September 1939 German armies invaded Poland and henceforth his main energies were devoted to the conduct of a war he had unleashed to dominate Europe and secure Germany's "living space."

The first phase of World War II was dominated by German Blitzkrieg tactics: sudden shock attacks against airfields, communications, military installations, using fast mobile armor and infantry to follow up on the first wave of bomber and fighter aircraft. Poland was overrun in less than one month, Denmark and Norway in two months, Holland, Belgium, Luxemburg and France in six weeks. After the fall of France in June 1940 only Great Britain stood firm. Leading to the Battle of Britain. The rearmament program should have alerted NATO allies as to his plans. He ordered fast tanks and 'Stuka' dive bombers, Junkers Ju 87, along with strategic deals with the Axis powers; Italy and Japan.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Battle of Britain, is where the British Royal Air Force prevented the Luftwaffe from securing aerial control over the English Channel. This was Hitler's first 'setback,' causing the planned invasion of the British Isles to be postponed. The Brits secret weapons being radar - Range and Direction Finding (RDF) and the Chain Home Guard.

 

The 'setback' for Vladimir Putin, was the fighting spirit of the Ukraine, at last supported by the EU and USA, where he simply walked in Crimea, unopposed. Indeed, Putin's saber-rattling, nuclear rhetoric, and military displays of power (marches) have failed. The Ukraine has a leader with gusto, the size of a brass space-hopper.

 

Depending on his mood swings and level or perceived desperation, the 'Red Peril' may finally punch the nuclear bag. We imagine this threat is real, spoken of many times as a threat in case Russia starts losing ground seriously, politically and geographically. Meaning that everyone, all over the world should not be shocked if it happens, and should be preparing for the worst case scenario. Mainly, to ensure survival in sufficient numbers to be able to stage a comeback. Not to waste that opportunity, should the indescribable be forced upon us.

 

Take a leaf out of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs, that effectively ended WW2. If Putin is rash enough to unleash thermonuclear hell, the West should take that opportunity to completely neutralize the Russian threat, so sending a clear message to potentially fanatical adversaries like Iran and North Korea. No matter what the cost. It will be cheaper for planet earth in the long run.

 

Indeed, as allies of Russia, Iran and North Korea may care to enjoin. Giving the remainder of the developed world, NATO allies and even UK allies who are not members of NATO, the opportunity to obliterate those threats. From which (relatively) clean slate, the world, as Nations United, might rebuild from a more stable starting point. Barren, but stable; a clean canvas. Unthinkable that such a confrontation represents, every cloud has a silver lining. Leaving only China and India, to come to terms with. Who may then see reason, in curtailing their present nuclear ambitions. Not least because the cheap coal, gas and oil will have evaporated. Putting their economies into a nose dive, save for rice, tea and spices as exports. But when? When will the land be washed sufficiently to farm, and how many farmers will be able bodied enough to tend the crops?

 

Fingers crossed, the world will not be too polluted, and that any nuclear winter might be survivable. Though this goes against all that the Cleaner Ocean Foundation stands for, in the real world, one should be prepared. In the words of Sir Winston Churchill: "Speak softly, but carry a big stick."

 

What is clear, is that any nation treading a similar path to Adolf Hitler, will eventually come up against some serious competition for survival. Cannibalism will be rife. Pork pie anyone?

 

 

 

         

 

 

Portrait of a war criminal, trained by Russian's secret service, where their job constituted an apprenticeship for what was to come, the mass murder of Ukrainian citizens, as a butchering psychopath. Vladimir Putin is pictured above as a child, and then clawing his way up the power ladder as an KGB officer, with who knows how many assassinations ordered by his then superiors, along the way, as he developed a circle of alliances based on fear. The KGB being the right training ground for political success, for those ruthless enough to quash opposition the old fashioned way. Much as with Adolf Hitler and his Gestapo. That is why it is dangerous to keep anyone in any position for too long. Change is essential to prevent cozy relationships developing into a full blown dictatorship. And that means free elections is a true democracy. The only exceptions to this rule, being a few very well balanced individuals, who don't have an axe to grind, and respect geographical boundaries. Holding life to be precious, and human rights sacrosanct.

 

The KGB was a military service governed by army laws and regulations, in the same fashion as the Soviet Army or the MVD Internal Troops. While most of the KGB archives remain classified, two online documentary sources are available. Its main functions were foreign intelligence, counter-intelligence, operative-investigative activities, guarding the state border of the USSR, guarding the leadership of the Central Committee of the Communist Party and the Soviet Government, organization and security of government communications as well as combating nationalist, dissident, religious and anti-Soviet activities. On 3 December 1991, the KGB was officially dissolved. It was later succeeded in Russia by the Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) and what would later become the Federal Security Service (FSB). After becoming president, Vladimir Putin launched a major reorganization of the FSB. First, the FSB was placed under direct control of the President by a decree issued on 17 May 2000.

 

 

MODUS OPERANDI PUTIN & JINPING V ADOLF HITLER

 

There is not much to differentiate between Jinping and Putin in terms of their modus operandi. Except that China is trying to take over the world financially in addition to building a military force, while Russia seeks to bludgeon it's neighbors with tanks and missiles. Both dictators share startling similarities with Adolf Hitler. Then there is Kim Jong-Un's pledge to build more nuclear weapons this year.

 

 

DAILY EXPRESS 27 FEBRUARY 2024 - ALARM BELLS RAISED OVER SHOCKING SIMILARITIES BETWEEN VLADIMIR PUTIN AND XI JINPING

Government officials have issued concerning warnings over the dangerous parallels between Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, specifically in how they deal with their perceived enemies.

It has been argued that Putin views Ukraine in the same way that Xi views Taiwan, creating great cause for concern for both countries.

Russia's war in Ukraine recently marked its second anniversary and, now in its third year, the conflict has a death toll of tens of thousands of people, and has cost billions.

In China, the Communist Party argued that Taiwan is part of its territory and has vowed to take the island in order to control it, using force if necessary.

Former Taiwan Presidential spokesperson Kolas Yotaka expressed her concern over the increasingly striking similarities between the leaders of the two countries, drawing parallels between their brutal leadership styles.

She told CNN: "Putin and Xi Jinping are similar because both of them believe they represent the old imperial power in their countries. And they are the chosen leaders who can defend their countries from foreign powers. They think they are the chosen ones. And they want to stay in power forever. But this is scary. And this is nonsense."

Her claims are evident in how they have handled the respective conflicts they are embroiled in. Putin has justified his invasion of Ukraine by playing on ideas of nationalism and historical issues, the same reasons for which Xi lays claim over Taiwan.

When discussing Taiwan, Xi said: "We will continue to strive for peaceful reunification with the greatest of sincerity and the upmost effort, but we will never promise to renounce the use of force and we reserve the option of taking all measures necessary."

Kolas warned: "Anyone who cares about democracy, anyone who cares about human rights, they have to pay attention," referring to the worrying similarities in how the leaders believe they should own their neighbouring countries.

This warning comes after NATO Secretary General Jens Stolenberg tried to raise awareness over the "partnership" between Putin and Xi. He said: "[Putin] signed an agreement with President Xi where they promised each other a partnership without any limits.

And what we see is that China and Russia are [becoming] closer and closer. So of course, if President Putin wins in Ukraine, it's not only challenging for the Ukrainians."

He continued: "It sends a message not only to Putin, but also to Xi that when they use military force, they get what they want. What happens in Ukraine today can happen in Taiwan tomorrow."

Concerns have been exacerbated by Xi's unwillingness to condemn the war in Ukraine while simultaneously strengthening his relationship with Putin, economically and diplomatically, especially in the wake of sanctions placed on Russia.

[Solution: NATO should immediately expedite Ukraine's entry into the Alliance, to enable full military support. Before it is too late. You cannot stop an avalanche, after it has begun. Emergency measures might be invoked to overcome present entry rules, to just a majority vote, as in WWII, to stop the strategic Chino/Russo landslide, before it gains in strength. This qualifies as diplomacy, a blue growth strategy. After membership of Sweden and Ukraine is ratified, NATO might begin negotiations with Russia, for cessation of hostilities.]

DAILY EXPRESS 27 FEBRUARY 2024 - WW3 FEARS SURGE AS HORROR MAP SHOWS PUTIN PREPARING FOR 'LARGE-SCALE' WAR WITH NATO

World War 3 fears have surged yet again after US defence analysts released maps of military restructuring that they warn show Vladimir Putin is preparing Russia for a "large-scale" conflict with NATO.

It is the latest in a string of warnings that the world is teetering on the edge of global conflict. Earlier this year, UK Defence Secretary Grant Shapps said the world is now in a "pre-war" phase ahead of a possible World War 3.

The world war rhetoric has ramped up significantly in the past seven days, with fresh warning signs coming from China and Europe. In a major escalation of the WW3 threat, Beijing has started recruiting 'civilian' soldiers.

Meanwhile, closer to home, Latvia has urged the UK to consider bringing back conscription, help bolster Europe's defence efforts against Russia. It comes after Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko - a key Putin ally - warned the West it was on the "edge of the abyss" of global conflict. [Same applies to Belarus, but not unless NATO acts at lightning speed.]

Now, the Russian president has signed a decree that officially reinstates the Moscow and Leningrad military districts in western Russia. The move codifies the Kremlin's major military restructuring and reform efforts.

The Institute for the Study of War (ISW), an American nonprofit research group and think tank based in Washington, D.C. claims the restructuring shows Putin is, in the long term, "preparing for a potential future large-scale conventional war against NATO".

In its latest assessment of Russia's offensive campaign in Ukraine, ISW shared maps showing Moscow's restructuring of military command districts - which swallows up large chunks of Ukraine - and say it puts Russia on a world war footing.

The research group and think tank said: "The inclusion of both the occupied and un-occupied parts of Ukrainian territory further suggests that Russia maintains maximalist objectives in Ukraine and seeks to fully absorb all five of these Ukrainian territories into the Russian Federation.

"The formal transfer of regions previously under the responsibility of the Northern Fleet is likely part of a wider Russian effort to re-establish military district commands as the primary headquarters for the Russian ground forces while reassigning naval assets to the Russian Navy.

"The re-creation of the MMD and LMD supports the parallel objectives of consolidating control over Russian operations in Ukraine in the short-to-medium term and preparing for a potential future large-scale conventional war against NATO in the long term."

The institute notes that NATO is set to expand after Hungary's formal approval of Sweden's accession bid.

It then observes that Putin "signed two decrees on February 26 that officially re-establish the Moscow and Leningrad Military Districts, codifying major Russian military restructuring and reform efforts".

One of these decrees effectively transfers military command in north west Russia from the Northern Fleet to the newly formed Leningrad Military District (LMD), says the ISW.

The other formally re-establishes the Moscow Military District (MMD), which takes over most of the territory previously under the control of the Western Military District.

And it also incorporated occupied areas of Ukraine like Crimea - plus areas like Kherson, Zaporizhia, Donetsk, and Luhansk which are still under Kyiv's control - into a new Southern Military District (SMD).

 

 

 

 

 

 

METRO 25 JANUARY 2024 - COULD THE UK BE DRAWN INTO WAR? THREE THREATS THAT COULD SPARK WORLD WAR THREE

Ominous warnings from Russia, missile strikes in the Middle East and uneasy diplomacy in China – the threat of World War Three has never loomed larger.

In a chilling speech earlier this month, defence minister Grant Shapps declared that international relations have entered ‘a new era’.

‘We must be prepared to deter our enemies, prepared to lead our allies and prepared to defend our nation whenever the call comes,’ he said.

Shapps said Russia, China and Iran posed serious threats, calling them ‘unstable’ and ‘irrational’.

And it’s not the only time a top UK figure has alluded to war in recent weeks.

Britain’s top general on Tuesday warned that civilians could be conscripted to fight a war against Russia, saying the UK’s military is much ‘too small’ to handle such a conflict on its own.

General Sir Patrick Sanders believes there should be a ‘shift’ in the mindset of the public regarding their willingness to defend their country against foreign adversaries.

General Sanders’ remarks come nearly two years after he said Britain was facing a ‘1937 moment’ – a reference to the two years preceding the Second World War. Here’s everything we know right now.

WILL THE UK GO TO WAR WITH RUSSIA?

Russia’s war in Ukraine is fast approaching its 700th day, with its two-year anniversary taking place on 24 February.

While Ukraine’s army regained some territory in recent counteroffensives, the situation on the ground has remained much the same since Vladimir Putin’s invasion.

The Russian President plans to boost his country’s military with an additional 170,000 troops, according to reports – signalling Russia’s commitment to step up the conflict.

A leaked document from the German Ministry of Defence earlier this week laid out Russia’s plan to launch a spring offensive in Ukraine in February.

The report also warned that Russia could launch covert attacks on NATO territory as early as July this year.

There are already signs that Russia is prepared to breach NATO borders. In December, a Russian drone crater was discovered in a Romanian village.

A Russian assault on a NATO member could trigger Article 5 of the NATO treaty, which means the country under attack would be entitled to help from other countries in the alliance.

The treaty says that member states would be required to take ‘such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force’.

In this situation, the UK and other NATO members would not be obliged to declare war on Russia – although it remains a possibility.

It’s likely that the UK would at least deploy troops, alongside other NATO countries, in such a scenario.

Ukraine is not a member of NATO, which is why the UK did not go to war with Russia following the 2022 invasion.

The UK has pledged almost £12 billion in support to Ukraine, as well as supplying tanks and strike missiles and providing training to Ukrainian troops.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak recently warned that ‘if Putin wins in Ukraine, he will not stop there’.

‘That is why Ukraine’s security is our security,’ he added.

Elsewhere, fears of a war with Russia are growing.

Sweden’s civil defence minister Carl-Oskar Bohlin in January told citizens to consider joining a ‘voluntary defence organisation’, as he warned that the risk of war was greater than at any time since World War Two.

Donald Trump, who is currently leading the race to become the Republican’s presidential nominee ahead of the US election in November, allegedly said he would not help the European Union if it came under attack.

WHAT'S GOING ON IN THE MIDDLE EAST - AND COULD IT ESCALATE?

 

International attention has been fixed on the Middle East since Hamas’s attack on Israel on 7 October, and Israel’s resulting bombardment of the Gaza Strip.

In response, the Houthis – a political militant group who control much of northern Yemen – kicked off a targeted campaign of drone and missile attacks on commercial ships in the Red Sea.

The group said they are targeting Israeli-linked vessels in support of the Palestinian people.

Almost two months into the Houthi assaults, the UK and US launched military strikes on rebel targets on January 11.

Logistical hubs, air defence systems and weapons storage locations were hit by airstrikes, according to officials.

Corey Ranslem, CEO of maritime intelligence company Dryad Global, told Metro.co.uk that clashes between the US and the Houthis could continue in the coming weeks.

‘The US has put together the coalition, Prosperity Guardian, to counter the attacks within this region,’ the US Coast Guard veteran said.

‘This operation involves a number of countries and the priority is to provide air cover for commercial vessels operating within this region.’

US President Joe Biden warned that the US could retaliate further, saying: ‘We will make sure that we respond to the Houthis if they continue this outrageous behaviour along with our allies.’

Former President Donald Trump, meanwhile, has warned that the US stands ‘on the brink’ of WWIII after three American soldiers were killed in a drone strike in Jordan.

Republican US senators have been piling pressure on Joe Biden in the wake with one calling for ‘devastating retaliation across the Middle East’. 

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said the actions of the Houthi rebels represented the ‘biggest attack on the Royal Navy for decades’.

He added that the UK launched strikes on two Houthi sites in ‘limited, necessary and proportionate self-defence’.

The Houthis are fighting a Saudi Arabia-backed military coalition in Yemen’s civil war, which has been ongoing for almost a decade.

The UK, who sees Saudi Arabia as an ally, has supplied weapons to the Saudi-led side for seven years.

However, despite its relationship with Saudi Arabia and strikes on Houthi forces, recent statements have made it clear that the UK wants to avoid war in the region.

In a joint statement from the US, the UK, Australia, Bahrain, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Netherlands, New Zealand and South Korea said the ‘aim remains to de-escalate tensions and restore stability in the Red Sea’.

The Houthis are backed by Iran, who support a number of groups across the Middle East as part of its ‘Axis of Resistance’.

Iran has launched attacks on three countries in the Middle East in recent days.

On Tuesday, it carried out strikes in Pakistan, reportedly killing two children.

Pakistan called the attack an ‘illegal act’ and an ‘unprovoked violation of its airspace by Iran’.

Pakistan on Thursday hurled a volley of retaliatory missiles into Iran. Three women and four children were killed, according to officials.

Pakistan said it ‘fully respects’ Iran’s ‘sovereignty and territorial integrity’, but added that it carried out the strikes to ‘protect and defend its national security against all threats’.

Both countries believe the other is harbouring militant groups.

Iran said its strikes on Pakistan were aimed at Jaish al-Adl, a militant group that has carried out attacks in Iran, while Pakistan said it was targeting Baloch separatist groups inside Iran.

Iran has also attacked groups in Iraq and Syria this week.

IS CHINA A THREAT TO THE UK?

Tensions between China and Taiwan have mounted in recent years.

Taiwan is an island nation 100 miles off the coast of China. The country has had many different rulers over the course of its history.

In the 17th century, it was controlled by the Chinese empire, before it was claimed by Japan in 1895.

When Japan lost World War Two, China regained power.

Today, Taiwan is self-governed, but it is neither officially independent from China nor united with it.

Many Taiwanese people want their country to be recognised as separate from China.

Earlier in January, Taiwanese voters elected Lai Ching-te as their new President.

Lai previously served as vice president of the Democratic Progressive Party, which rejects China’s territorial claims in Taiwan.

China views Lai as a dangerous supporter of Taiwanese independence.

While Lai said that he had an ‘important responsibility to maintain peace and stability in the Taiwan Straits’, he also cautioned that he is ‘determined to safeguard Taiwan from threats and intimidation from China’.

Only 13 nations recognise Taiwan as a state.

Countries are reluctant to make such a declaration as doing so would threaten diplomatic ties with China.

While it does not recognise Taiwan as a state, the US is one of the country’s key allies. It’s made a legal commitment to provide Taiwan with weapons if it needs to defend itself.

The UK government has said it has no plans to recognise Taiwan as an independent state.

However, the relationship between the two countries has strengthened in recent years, with the UK sending its warships on operations through the Taiwan Strait.

Last year, a group of British MPs called on the government to give ‘as much help as possible’ to Taiwan to defend itself against China.

It’s unclear whether China really plans to ever invade Taiwan.

Speaking last year, former foreign secretary James Cleverly said that ‘no country could shield itself from the repercussions of a war in Taiwan’.

IS THE UK PREPARED FOR WAR?

The UK spends around £50 billion a year on defence. [Much of which goes on procurement fraud]

Earlier this week, the Ministry of Defence announced that 20,000 troops from the Royal Navy, the British Army and the Royal Air force will be deployed across Europe in the first half of 2024.

It is one of the largest NATO deployments since the Cold War.

Defence secretary Grant Shapps announced that the government will spend around £13 billion on ‘next generation’ Dreadnought submarines, which carry Trident nuclear missiles.

‘If we are to defend our homeland, we must ensure our entire defence eco-system is ready,’ Shapps said.

Rishi Sunak added: ‘In dangerous times, we are investing in defence, hardening our critical infrastructure and building our alliances.’

[Solution: Stop importing anything from China. if India continues to purchase Russian fossil fuels, stop imports from India. This qualifies as diplomacy, a blue growth strategy.]

 

 

 

   

 

 

"WE'LL GET THE BASTARDS" - China has a long established relationship with Russia, to include satellites for space wars, apart from the import of cheap fossil fuels, to underpin a massive building programme that would end in tears, and bankruptcy. It may be that the only way to force the "Strategic" partnership to back down is to deploy nuclear missiles. That is of course why the US, UK, France and other nuclear nations have such weapons. This is the big "stick" references by Sir Winston Churchill. Presumably then, prudence demands that NATO, and NATO's allies - that should now include South America, Australia and any enemy of China, such as Taiwan and South Korea. Should be preparing to survive a nuclear exchange.

 

"WE'LL HELP BY BUYING YOUR OIL OLD CHAP" - Vladimir Putin and Narendra Modi, no doubt shaking hands on some deal, one of which could have been the continued supply of fossil fuels to underpin the rapid industrial expansion of India's economy, nuclear navy and space program. Despite, those exports financing Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

 

[Solutions: Start building communal nuclear fallout shelters, one for every village, and keep them fully stocked with food and water. Amend the Permitted Development Orders, to allow building of private underground shelters, without the need to apply for planning permission. We'd also need early warning sirens, linked to the military, to give at least a two minute warning. This qualifies as a blue growth strategy, sending a clear message to China, India, Iran, North Korea and Russia, etc., that we are preparing for the end game. Suggest the same for African allies, Australia, USA, Canada, Commonwealth islands, South America, Pakistan, and European allies. In other words a unified response. Giving those in an extended NATO alliance, the upper hand. Go ahead, spark a nuclear war. You will lose! At the moment, it is 50/50. We need to improve the odds of survival.]

 

 

 

 

Ukraine represents the fight for freedom and the rights of every human to live a full life, free from oppression.

 

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/us-news/world-war-3-5-chilling-31982999

https://www.wikihow.com/Build-a-Fallout-Shelter

https://www.wikihow.com/Build-a-Fallout-Shelter

https://www.survivopedia.com/9-ways-to-diy-a-low-effort-cheap-bomb-shelter/

https://www.survivopedia.com/9-ways-to-diy-a-low-effort-cheap-bomb-shelter/

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/us-news/world-war-3-5-chilling-31982999

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THIS WAS THE NAZI GOVERNMENT IN 1939 TO 1945 - ADOLF HITLER'S HENCHMEN

 

 

Adolf Hitler German Chancellor	Herman Goring Reichsmarschall	Heinrich Himmler Reichsführer	Joseph Goebbels Reich Minister	Philipp Bouhler SS NSDAP Aktion T4	Dr Josef Mengele Physician Auschwitz
Martin Borman Schutzstaffel	Adolph Eichmann Holocaust Architect	Rudolf Hess Commandant	Erwin Rommel The Desert Fox	Karl Donitz Kriegsmarine	Albert Speer Nazi Architect

 

 

 

 

YOU MAY BE THINKING THAT THE NAZI MOVEMENT IS ALIVE AND WELL IN EVERY COUNCIL PLANNING AND TAXATION DEPARTMENT

 

 

 

  

 

 

Adolf Hitler and chum Heinrich Himmler  [Allegedly, Adolf Hitler did not die in that bunker incident C.1949.  Apparently, he was fired into England, strapped to a V1 rocket, leaving behind his false teeth.  He parachuted into Wealden that night hoping to meet some deviants, who'd arranged a new identity for their fallen comrade.  Apparently, he landed in Crowborough, shaved off his moustache and was mistaken for a council official, whereupon he infiltrated the ranks of the local council and trained them how to use his terror tactics to control the peasant civilians]