RACHEL REEVES - PENSIONS PARIAH

 

  WHY FEED THE BLACK HOLE, BETTER TO GET RID OF DEAD MEAT LOAFING SPNGERS ON SOCIETY WITH AI ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE THAT IS NOT CORRUPT - FOR CRISPER, HONEST AND IMPARTIAL DECISION MAKING

 

GRIT YOUR TEETH WHEN USING OUR A-Z TO REVIEW LABOUR'S PROGRESS, OR GO HOME

 

 

 

 

 

Rachel Reeves - Blood sucking vampire Chancellor?


 

 

 

Why is the UK digging itself deeper into debt? We say the rot is here to stay, unless somebody is brave enough to call a spade a spade. Politicians must face up to corruption and crooked employees in local government. And of course the societal cling-ons who represent dead meat. Those who contribute nothing, but get themselves into plum jobs to be able t milk the system and make a few dodgy deals for themselves along the way.

 

Present UK staffing levels go way beyond "to many chiefs and not enough Indians." We are addicted to hiring staff to spy on the electorate. We hired an army of police who are in the back pockets of corrupt local authorities. We hired an army of councillors' who don't make decisions any more under delegated authority now prevalent in councils. We hired an army of council workers who do nothing more than collect taxes to pay for their golden parachutes. Looking to cheat people of services, denying truths and even rigging courts to deny their victims of a Fair Hearing. It is legalised Human Rights rape.

 

We hired an army of MPs, who are running around like headless chickens, clucking about nothing much as they cop hold of their salaries and enhanced pensions, while doing second jobs on the side. Often refusing to represent the electorate, when faced with allegations of corruption in their district.

 

The end result of all of these "Cling-Ons" is a Pension bill the "Indians", the "workers and those who worked for a living" are having to fork out by way of increased taxes on things like pensions and capital gains on inheritance. And, as more non-productive workers are hired to administer an imploding economy, the country's administrative Pension bill is getting more Top Heavy. Meaning more borrowing. It is nuts! It is Vampire Politics. Sucking the life blood out of those who played by the rules during their working life, and are now defenseless against unscrupulous and immoral taxation changes.

 

The economy should not have to borrow money to stay afloat. It should be self sustaining, not a Red Dwarf.

 

Simply put, the country cannot continue to pay for top heavy management. Not in an age of AI, that can be used to find those who are not performing. Instead of covering up corruption and negligence, there should be new laws fining those responsible, and sacking them for negligence. The penalty being loss of their official pensions. So curing the blood sucking black hole.

 

In the UK councils and MPs who break the law are protected from prosecution. And the borrowing to underpin the already ridiculous levels of debt, increases again with every cover up. Proof that policies under Labour are not working, and stand little chance of working in the future if the reason for all of this borrowing is not weeded out at grass root level.

 

PROCUREMENT FRAUD & SACKINGS FOR NEGLIGENCE - WITH FORFEITURE OF PENSIONS

 

One obvious way of reducing the Pensions Black Hole, is very Rishi Sunack in style. Simply impose new sanctions on those performing public duties, including banks and bankers, who break the law, or do not reach minimum productivity standards using time and motion algorithms to identify slackers. The country also needs new enforceable laws that instantly sacks corrupt officers, MPs and town planners. Indeed, anyone who is employed to provide a public service that attracts a pension. Rishi Sunack did this with harsh penalties for late filings, and removal of postal reminders to trap the forgetful into boosting treasury coffers.

 

With so much corruption in local government, why not reduce the pubic sector pension bill with instant sackings. Of course, first of all changing the rules to allow that. So that, instead of rewarding lying and cheating with renewal of employment in the same position, or even promotion. Make those shirking and clearly mis-applying policies, typically those who award planning consents to friends and developers - who then give perks to council employees and Councillors who assist in what amounts to procurement fraud.

 

A blitz on the corruption in local government and policing might not be popular with those on the gravy train, but sure as hell, will make a difference in slowly but surely weeding out offenders. A societal band-aid plaster.

 

For example, those planners and councillors found guilty of discrimination, awarding contracts to friends, or simply making irregular investments using public money, should be sacked for incompetence or impropriety, losing all benefits like publicly funded pensions as the penalty for misuse of public funds, or other abuses of positions of trust.

 

Such penalties should have the full effect of the law and new laws designed to ensnare fraudsters occupying official positions of trust.

 

REFORM - ADDICTIONS - ALCOHOLIC CRONYISMS

One of the biggest challenges in reforming the bureaucracy is likely to be gaining the support of politicians who may benefit from the current system themselves. This is one of the reasons why people choose to get into politics, apart from an aversion to physical labour.

The comparison to an alcoholic admitting they have a drink problem is apt. Just as it can be difficult for an alcoholic to acknowledge their addiction, it can be challenging for politicians to admit that the system they are part of is flawed or inefficient.

Overcoming this challenge may require a combination of factors, such as:

- Public pressure: If the public is united in demanding reform, politicians may be more likely to listen.

 

- Evidence of inefficiency: If there is clear evidence that the bureaucracy is inefficient or wasteful, it may be harder for politicians to justify maintaining the status quo. Evidence should not be buried, but claims to corruption fully investigated - and not by a police force that is paid by those being investigated.

 

- Alternative solutions: If there are viable alternative solutions that can be shown to be more efficient or effective, politicians may be more willing to support reform.

It's also important to note that even if politicians are willing to support reform, there may be other obstacles to overcome. For example, there may be powerful interest groups that oppose change, or there may be practical difficulties in implementing new systems and processes. This is called Red Flag politics. Red Flag lobbies are the enemy of transparency, justice and fair taxation.

Overcoming these challenges will require a concerted effort from a variety of stakeholders, including politicians, civil servants, business leaders, and most of all the voting public.


CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS

A valid point is that potential conflicts of interest that can arise when politicians and civil servants are involved in decision-making. They will not want to rock the boat: 'HMS Corruption.' It's a bit like not wanting to pay reparations for enslaving innocent Africans, used to farm cotton and other cash crops in the colonies. The backbone of the British Empire.

Implementing stringent checks on income, expenditure, and assets could be a useful measure to address this issue. Such checks could help to identify potential instances of corruption and deter individuals (politicians, council executives and planning officers) from engaging in unethical behavior.

Implementing such a system would require careful consideration and planning. It would be necessary to establish clear guidelines and procedures for conducting these checks, as well as ensuring that they are carried out in a fair and impartial manner. The algorithms already exist in anti-money and anti-terrorism routine checks.

There is no invasion of privacy where the interests of the already State allow such methods. They are necessary in difficult to enforce in cases where individuals are deliberately trying to conceal their financial activities.

The risks of corruption outweigh the potential negative consequences of such a system.


ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE 

An AI chatbot could potentially analyze current legislation and identify areas where bureaucracy could be streamlined. It could do this by:

Identifying redundant or outdated laws: AI could compare current laws to each other and to historical data to identify laws that are no longer relevant or that overlap with other laws.
Identifying inefficient processes: AI could analyze government processes to identify inefficiencies and bottlenecks that could be eliminated or streamlined.
Assessing the impact of changes: AI could simulate the potential impact of proposed changes to laws or processes to ensure that they will not have unintended negative consequences.

However, it's important to note that AI is not a substitute for human judgment. While AI can provide valuable insights and recommendations, it is ultimately up to humans to make decisions about how to reform the bureaucracy.


IMPLEMENTATION EXAMPLES

AI can be implemented in a way that is transparent, ethical, and free from bias, it could potentially lead to a number of positive outcomes.

By replacing jobs that are not needed, it is possible that some individuals could be freed up to join the workforce in other areas where there are skills and manpower shortages. This could help to address labor shortages and boost the economy.

The transition to an AI-driven administration may be challenging. There may be resistance from those who fear job loss, and it may take time for individuals to acquire the skills needed for new roles.

The potential benefits of replacing administrative non-workers with AI will depend on a number of factors, including:

- The types of jobs that are replaced: If AI is used to replace jobs that are low-skilled or repetitive, the impact on the workforce may be significant, such as forms that tick boxes that is ideal number crunching where computers excel.

 

We are not suggesting the AI is used to replace jobs that require human judgment and creativity. But there is very little creativity in managing council budgets or giving planning consents - where local plans and housing needs and provisions should be automated based on geographical needs, not favour to old farming mates and vendettas that have already cost councils £millions of pounds of tax payer's money.

 

- The availability of new jobs: Even if individuals are able to transition to new roles, there is no guarantee that suitable jobs will be available.

The effectiveness of AI: AI must be able to perform its tasks effectively and reliably in order to justify the replacement of human workers.


ECONOMIC
IRRESPONSIBILITY

 

In her first major speech as Chancellor, Ms Reeves said she had discovered how bad things are in her first 72 hours in the job as she grapples with the legacy of "14 years of chaos and economic irresponsibility". Treasury analysis she saw over the weekend showed the UK's economy would have been £140billion bigger - with £58billion more for public services - if it had grown at the average rate of OECD economies during the last 14 years. It appears she has settled for long-term decline that will be outstripped by inflation year on year. Real term increases in public spending announced by the Chancellor cannot possibly be supported by the lamentable growth targets. She is battening down the hatches as best she may, without dealing with the rotten apples in the barrel.

 

PENSION AND EXPENSES BLACK HOLES

 

Thousands of council jobs might go using AI administration to shore un the Pension Black Hole. There are councillors pulling down expenses when almost all planning decisions are delegated to officers. In many cases councillors are bullied and brainwashed into silence. When they should be asking questions. But don't.

 

And that goes for civil service jobs and duplication of effort. The UK might operate more efficiently without the armies of civil servants, non productive workers in plum jobs who produce nothing and simply gum up the works with more red tape, obfuscation and negativity - seeking to justify (build) their part.

 

Criminal charges should be brought against Southern Water, Northumbrian Water, South West Water, United Utilities, Thames Water, Wessex Water Anglian Water, Severn Trent and Yorkshire Water for persistent discharge of sewage into our rivers and seas. The penalty for long term non-compliance could be loss of their franchise, as part of new statute.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

....

 

 

 

 

 

CONTACT CHANCELLOR RACHEL REEVES


Westminster Office
House of Commons

London, SW1A 0AA

Tel: 020 7219 5437

 

 

 

 

SIR KEIR STARMER'S LABOUR PARTY CABINET 2024

 

 

 

 

Sir Keir Starmer

 

 

 

Angela Rayner

 

 

 

Rachel Reeves

 

 

 

David Lammy

 

 

 

Yvette Cooper

 

 

 

 Lord Richard Hermer KC

 

 

 

 Shabana Mahmood

 

 

 

 Lisa Nandy

 

 

 

Steve Reed

 

 

 

 John Healey

 

 

 

 Wes Streeting

 

 

 

 Ed Miliband

 

 

 

Bridget Phillipson

 

 

 

 Pat McFadden

 

 

 

 Louise Haigh

 

 

 

Ian Murray

 

 

 

Jo Stevens

 

 

 

 Hillary Benn

 

 

 

 Peter Kyle

 

 

 

 Liz Kendal

 

 

 

Johnathan Reynolds

 

 

 

 Lucy Powell

 

 

 

 James Timpson

 

 

 

 Sir Patrick Vallance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LINKS & REFERENCE


https://www.

 

 

 

 

BUSHYWOOD MPs A - Z INDEX ARCHIVE