FOI FREEDOM OF INTFORMATION REQUEST GOV UK ONE LOGIN LIZ KENDALL SECRETARY CABINET MINISTERS GOVERNMENT HORIZON POST OFFICE SCANDAL

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUESTS

ONE WAY OF OBTAINING CRUCIAL INFORMATION, IS TO MAKE AN FOI. THEY WILL EITHER GIVE YOU THAT INFORMATION, OR RUN FOR COVER - MOST LIKELY RUN FOR COVER - WHICH IS OF ITSELF, EVIDENCE OF CORRUPTION AND COVER UP!

GRIT YOUR TEETH WHEN USING OUR A-Z TO REVIEW LABOUR'S PROGRESS, OR GO HOME

Liz Kendall - Science and Technology Secretary. WTF?

Oh boy. By this stage, you have been around the system several times, getting more confused by the hour. It appears, and is alleged that Ms Kendal and her partners in crime at Companies House, are trying to force the use of mobile phones and apps, or make it incredibly difficult, time consuming and expensive for those without, or who do not want to submit to hackers, fraudsters and the like. It smacks of institutional blackmail and Orwellian Big-Brother. WTF? Why not consider a Freedom of Information (FOI) to the Department for Science and Technology, Companies House, or Department for Business. Or, why not all three? CLICK HERE FOR A TEMPLATE

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 2000 – REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

[Your Name: Frustrated of Somewhere]

[Company Name: What The Fuck Limited]
[Address: George Orwell Alley

The Concentration Camp

Hang Them High

SW1 ???]
[Date]

To: Freedom of Information Team

[Companies House / Department for Business and Trade / Department for Science, Innovation and Technology]

Freedom of Information Request: GOV.UK One Login – System Failures, Complaints, Testing and Ministerial Awareness
I am writing to request information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 regarding the operation, testing, failure rates, and ministerial oversight of the GOV.UK One Login identity verification system, particularly as it relates to Companies House director verification.

This request concerns the period 1 January 2025 to the present.

Please provide the following information:

1. System Failures and Performance Data

1.1. Any internal reports, statistics, or summaries relating to failed identity verification attempts for Companies House users.
1.2. The number of users who were unable to receive verification codes (SMS or email).
1.3. The number of users who were locked out of the system following failed verification attempts.
1.4. Any internal assessments of SMS delivery failure rates or technical issues affecting code delivery.

2. Complaints and Escalations

2.1. The total number of formal complaints received relating to One Login verification failures.
2.2. Copies of any internal summaries, briefings, or dashboards tracking user complaints about One Login.
2.3. Any internal correspondence discussing patterns of failure affecting multiple companies or users at the same address.

3. Testing, Risk Assessments, and Readiness

3.1. Copies of any User Acceptance Testing (UAT) reports for One Login prior to rollout for Companies House director verification.
3.2. Any risk assessments, impact assessments, or readiness reviews conducted before making One Login mandatory for directors.
3.3. Any documents identifying known issues at the time of rollout, including issues relating to SMS delivery, identity matching, or account lockouts.

4. Ministerial and Senior Leadership Awareness

4.1. Copies of any briefings provided to ministers (including the Secretaries of State for DBT and DSIT) regarding One Login failures or risks.
4.2. Any correspondence between Companies House, DBT, and DSIT discussing concerns raised by MPs, businesses, or the public.
4.3. Any internal communications discussing the volume of complaints or the need for ministerial response.

5. Contingency Planning and Alternative Verification Routes

5.1. Any documents outlining contingency plans for users unable to verify through One Login.
5.2. Any internal discussions regarding the use of solicitors as a fallback verification method.
5.3. Any assessments of the cost burden placed on users forced to use solicitor verification due to system failure.

6. Decision to Roll Out a Beta System

6.1. Any documents explaining why a Beta‑stage system was approved for mandatory use by millions of directors.
6.2. Any internal concerns raised about the readiness of One Login for statutory compliance.
6.3. Any correspondence discussing the risks of penalising users due to system failures.

Format and Delivery

Please provide the information in electronic format (PDF or email attachments).
If any part of this request is refused, please specify the exemption relied upon and provide the required public interest test.

If the request is too broad, please advise how it may be refined.

Statutory Rights

I look forward to your response within the statutory 20 working days.

Yours faithfully,

[Your Name]
[Your Company]

Britain represents just one catastrophe after another. But, why with so many checks in place, with existing systems, is it necessary to completely revise just about everything, in the process, cocking up just about everything. Who is responsible for this mess, and will they be sacked, or will this be another Horizon style cover up exercise, that the BBC will whitewash and edit, to make it look like it is the victims who are crazy!

CONTACT SIR KEIR & HIS CABINET

Westminster Office
House of Commons

London, SW1A 0AA

Tel: 020 7219 5437 (Don't bother, you'll only get the run around - put pen to paper, although, it is sometimes useful to record conversations, for later publication and evidential purposes. You'll need this is you want to involve the press. Thus, get yourself a digital recorder. They are under £20 on Amazon or Ebay. And not have lithium batteries and 10 or more hours of recording time. It is you right to receive and impart information, under Articles 9, and 10 of the European Convention of Human Rights, and Human Rights Act 1998. You do not need to ask permission to record - it is a right you already have.)